2025-03-03
Privatscore für Fr. Gunsser (1)
| Runde 1 | mit 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Nord | S 2♠ = | ♣D | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 2 | Nord | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 3 | Nord | O 4♠ X = | ♠9 | −790 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 4 | Nord | W 3♦ -2 | ♠B | +200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 12,50 % |
| Board 5 | Nord | O 3SA +2 | ♥2 | −460 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 6 | Nord | W 2♠ = | ♣3 | −110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 7 | Nord | W 4♠ +2 | ♦A | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 8 | Nord | W 3♦ = | ♥A | −110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 3 | mit 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 9 | Nord | W 4♠ +1 | ♥2 | −650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | Nord | S 2SA -2 | ♦4 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Nord | N 3SA -1 | ♠A | −50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 12 | Nord | W 2♥ +1 | ♦A | −140 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 4 | mit 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 65,63 % |
| Board 13 | Nord | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Nord | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Nord | N 2♠ = | ♣10 | +110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 16 | Nord | S 3SA +1 | ♠A | +430 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 17 | Nord | O 1SA +2 | ♠A | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | Nord | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Nord | O 4♣ X -3 | ♥10 | +800 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 20 | Nord | N 4♥ +1 | ♦2 | +650 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 15. Rang mit 74,0 MP = 46,25 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,03 |
Privatscore für Hr. U. Gminder (2)
| Runde 1 | mit 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 78,13 % |
| Board 5 | Nord | O 3SA = | ♥2 | −400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 6 | Nord | N 3♥ = | ♠K | +140 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 7 | Nord | W 2♥ +3 | ♣3 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | Nord | N 3SA +2 | ♦2 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 21,88 % |
| Board 9 | Nord | O 6♠ X = | ♥A | −1660 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | Nord | S 3♥ -4 | ♣2 | −400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 11 | Nord | W 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | Nord | W 4♥ -1 | ♦A | +50 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 3 | mit 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 13 | Nord | W 3♠ = | ♦D | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Nord | N 3SA +2 | ♠B | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 15 | Nord | S 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 16 | Nord | N 4♥ -2 | ♠10 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 4 | mit 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 17 | Nord | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 18 | Nord | O 2♠ +2 | ♣7 | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 19 | Nord | N 3♦ +2 | ♥7 | +150 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 20 | Nord | S 2♥ +2 | ♣D | +170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Nord | S 3♠ = | ♣2 | +140 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | Nord | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 3 | Nord | O 5♠ -1 | ♥K | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 4 | Nord | S 2♠ -2 | ♣6 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Ergebnis: 6. Rang mit 86,0 MP = 53,75 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,05 |
Privatscore für Fr. K. Panne (3)
| Runde 1 | mit 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 68,75 % |
| Board 9 | Nord | O 4♠ +1 | ♥A | −650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | Nord | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Nord | N 3SA = | ♥4 | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Nord | W 4♥ -1 | ♦K | +50 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 2 | mit 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Nord | W 3♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 14 | Nord | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Nord | S 1SA -4 | ♥3 | −400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 16 | Nord | N 2♥ +2 | ♠10 | +170 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 62,50 % |
| Board 17 | Nord | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 18 | Nord | O 4♠ +1 | ♣7 | −450 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | Nord | O 3♣ -1 | ♥10 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 20 | Nord | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 4 | mit 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Nord | S 2♠ -1 | ♣D | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 2 | Nord | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | Nord | N 4♥ +1 | ♠K | +450 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 4 | Nord | N 2SA -1 | ♥9 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 5 | mit 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 5 | Nord | O 2SA -2 | ♠9 | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 6 | Nord | N 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 7 | Nord | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | Nord | N 1SA +2 | ♥2 | +150 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Ergebnis: 6. Rang mit 86,0 MP = 53,75 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,31 |
Privatscore für Fr. Schatz (4)
| Runde 1 | mit 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 28,13 % |
| Board 13 | Nord | W 2♠ +1 | ♦D | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Nord | N 2SA +2 | ♠B | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Nord | W 2♦ +2 | ♥A | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 16 | Nord | W 2♠ +2 | ♥A | −170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 2 | mit 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 17 | Nord | O 1SA -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | Nord | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Nord | O 3♣ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 20 | Nord | S 3SA = | ♣D | +600 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 3 | mit 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 1 | Nord | S 2♠ -2 | ♣B | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | Nord | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | Nord | O 4♠ X -1 | ♥K | +200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 4 | Nord | W 2♠ -4 | ♣K | +400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 4 | mit 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 65,63 % |
| Board 5 | Nord | W 3♦ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 6 | Nord | N 3♦ -1 | ♠2 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 7 | Nord | O 3SA +1 | ♦8 | −630 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 8 | Nord | N 3SA +2 | ♥2 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 9 | Nord | O 4♠ +3 | ♥B | −710 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 10 | Nord | N 4♠ = | ♦7 | +620 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 11 | Nord | N 3SA = | ♠A | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Nord | W 3♥ -2 | ♦A | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 9. Rang mit 84,0 MP = 52,50 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,13 |
Privatscore für Fr. Thomanek (5)
| Runde 1 | mit 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 17 | Nord | O 2SA +1 | ♠A | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | Nord | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Nord | S 4♠ -5 | ♣9 | −250 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 20 | Nord | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 2 | mit 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Nord | S 3♠ -2 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | Nord | S 2SA +1 | ♥4 | +150 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | Nord | N 5♥ -1 | ♠K | −50 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 4 | Nord | N 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 3 | mit 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 5 | Nord | O 2SA = | ♠5 | −120 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 6 | Nord | W 2♠ -1 | ♣7 | +100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 7 | Nord | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | Nord | N 3SA +1 | ♥2 | +430 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 4 | mit 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 9 | Nord | O 4♠ +2 | ♣K | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 10 | Nord | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Nord | N 3SA = | ♣10 | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Nord | N 4♦ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Nord | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Nord | S 3SA +2 | ♥8 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 15 | Nord | N 3♠ -2 | ♥D | −200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 16 | Nord | N 2♥ +1 | ♠10 | +140 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Ergebnis: 16. Rang mit 70,0 MP = 43,75 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,50 |
Privatscore für Fr. Tritschler (6)
| Runde 1 | mit 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Süd | S 2♠ = | ♣D | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 2 | Süd | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 3 | Süd | O 4♠ X = | ♠9 | −790 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 4 | Süd | W 3♦ -2 | ♠B | +200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 21,88 % |
| Board 9 | Süd | O 6♠ X = | ♥A | −1660 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | Süd | S 3♥ -4 | ♣2 | −400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 11 | Süd | W 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | Süd | W 4♥ -1 | ♦A | +50 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 3 | mit 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 20,0 MP | = | 62,50 % |
| Board 17 | Süd | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 18 | Süd | O 4♠ +1 | ♣7 | −450 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | Süd | O 3♣ -1 | ♥10 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 20 | Süd | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 4 | mit 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 65,63 % |
| Board 5 | Süd | W 3♦ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 6 | Süd | N 3♦ -1 | ♠2 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 7 | Süd | O 3SA +1 | ♦8 | −630 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 8 | Süd | N 3SA +2 | ♥2 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Aufwertung | für 4 Boards: je 4,1 MP | 16,4 MP |
| Ergebnis: 13. Rang mit 81,4 MP = 50,88 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,10 |
Privatscore für Fr. Baur (7)
| Runde 1 | mit 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 78,13 % |
| Board 5 | Süd | O 3SA = | ♥2 | −400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 6 | Süd | N 3♥ = | ♠K | +140 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 7 | Süd | W 2♥ +3 | ♣3 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | Süd | N 3SA +2 | ♦2 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Süd | W 3♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 14 | Süd | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Süd | S 1SA -4 | ♥3 | −400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 16 | Süd | N 2♥ +2 | ♠10 | +170 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 1 | Süd | S 2♠ -2 | ♣B | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | Süd | O 4♠ X -1 | ♥K | +200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 4 | Süd | W 2♠ -4 | ♣K | +400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 4 | mit 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 9 | Süd | O 4♠ +2 | ♣K | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 10 | Süd | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Süd | N 3SA = | ♣10 | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Süd | N 4♦ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 17 | Süd | O 1SA +2 | ♠A | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | Süd | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Süd | O 4♣ X -3 | ♥10 | +800 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 20 | Süd | N 4♥ +1 | ♦2 | +650 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 90,0 MP = 56,25 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,27 |
Privatscore für Fr. Neifer (8)
| Runde 1 | mit 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 22,0 MP | = | 68,75 % |
| Board 9 | Süd | O 4♠ +1 | ♥A | −650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | Süd | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Süd | N 3SA = | ♥4 | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Süd | W 4♥ -1 | ♦K | +50 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 2 | mit 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 17 | Süd | O 1SA -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | Süd | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Süd | O 3♣ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 20 | Süd | S 3SA = | ♣D | +600 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 3 | mit 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 5 | Süd | O 2SA = | ♠5 | −120 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 6 | Süd | W 2♠ -1 | ♣7 | +100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 7 | Süd | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | Süd | N 3SA +1 | ♥2 | +430 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 4 | mit 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 21,0 MP | = | 65,63 % |
| Board 13 | Süd | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Süd | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Süd | N 2♠ = | ♣10 | +110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 16 | Süd | S 3SA +1 | ♠A | +430 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Süd | S 3♠ = | ♣2 | +140 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | Süd | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 3 | Süd | O 5♠ -1 | ♥K | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 4 | Süd | S 2♠ -2 | ♣6 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 91,0 MP = 56,88 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,28 |
Privatscore für Fr. Weimar (9)
| Runde 1 | mit 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 28,13 % |
| Board 13 | Süd | W 2♠ +1 | ♦D | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Süd | N 2SA +2 | ♠B | +180 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 15 | Süd | W 2♦ +2 | ♥A | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 16 | Süd | W 2♠ +2 | ♥A | −170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 2 | mit 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Süd | S 3♠ -2 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | Süd | S 2SA +1 | ♥4 | +150 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | Süd | N 5♥ -1 | ♠K | −50 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 4 | Süd | N 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 3 | mit 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 9 | Süd | W 4♠ +1 | ♥2 | −650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | Süd | S 2SA -2 | ♦4 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Süd | N 3SA -1 | ♠A | −50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 12 | Süd | W 2♥ +1 | ♦A | −140 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 4 | mit 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 17 | Süd | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 18 | Süd | O 2♠ +2 | ♣7 | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 19 | Süd | N 3♦ +2 | ♥7 | +150 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 20 | Süd | S 2♥ +2 | ♣D | +170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 5 | Süd | O 2SA -2 | ♠9 | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 6 | Süd | N 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 7 | Süd | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | Süd | N 1SA +2 | ♥2 | +150 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Ergebnis: 17. Rang mit 69,0 MP = 43,13 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,45 |
Privatscore für Fr. Wendler (10)
| Runde 1 | mit 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %)
gegen 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %) & 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 17 | Süd | O 2SA +1 | ♠A | −150 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | Süd | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Süd | S 4♠ -5 | ♣9 | −250 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 20 | Süd | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Runde 2 | mit 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %)
gegen 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 4,0 MP | = | 12,50 % |
| Board 5 | Süd | O 3SA +2 | ♥2 | −460 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 6 | Süd | W 2♠ = | ♣3 | −110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 7 | Süd | W 4♠ +2 | ♦A | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 8 | Süd | W 3♦ = | ♥A | −110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 3 | mit 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %)
gegen 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %) & 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 13 | Süd | W 3♠ = | ♦D | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Süd | N 3SA +2 | ♠B | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 15 | Süd | S 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 16 | Süd | N 4♥ -2 | ♠10 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 4 | mit 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Süd | S 2♠ -1 | ♣D | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 2 | Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | Süd | N 4♥ +1 | ♠K | +450 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 4 | Süd | N 2SA -1 | ♥9 | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 5 | mit 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %)
gegen 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %) & 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 9 | Süd | O 4♠ +3 | ♥B | −710 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 10 | Süd | N 4♠ = | ♦7 | +620 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 11 | Süd | N 3SA = | ♠A | +400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Süd | W 3♥ -2 | ♦A | +100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 17. Rang mit 69,0 MP = 43,13 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,01 |
Privatscore für Fr. E. Schmidt (11)
| Runde 1 | mit 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Ost | S 2♠ = | ♣D | +110 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 2 | Ost | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 3 | Ost | O 4♠ X = | ♠9 | −790 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 4 | Ost | W 3♦ -2 | ♠B | +200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 2 | mit 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Ost | W 3♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 14 | Ost | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | Ost | S 1SA -4 | ♥3 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 16 | Ost | N 2♥ +2 | ♠10 | +170 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 3 | mit 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 5 | Ost | O 2SA = | ♠5 | −120 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 6 | Ost | W 2♠ -1 | ♣7 | +100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 7 | Ost | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | Ost | N 3SA +1 | ♥2 | +430 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 4 | mit 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 17 | Ost | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 18 | Ost | O 2♠ +2 | ♣7 | −170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 19 | Ost | N 3♦ +2 | ♥7 | +150 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 20 | Ost | S 2♥ +2 | ♣D | +170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 9 | Ost | O 4♠ +3 | ♥B | −710 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 10 | Ost | N 4♠ = | ♦7 | +620 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 11 | Ost | N 3SA = | ♠A | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | Ost | W 3♥ -2 | ♦A | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Ergebnis: 19. Rang mit 67,0 MP = 41,88 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,59 |
Privatscore für Fr. Ruck (12)
| Runde 1 | mit 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 21,88 % |
| Board 5 | Ost | O 3SA = | ♥2 | −400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 6 | Ost | N 3♥ = | ♠K | +140 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 7 | Ost | W 2♥ +3 | ♣3 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | Ost | N 3SA +2 | ♦2 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 2 | mit 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 17 | Ost | O 1SA -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | Ost | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | Ost | O 3♣ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 20 | Ost | S 3SA = | ♣D | +600 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 9 | Ost | W 4♠ +1 | ♥2 | −650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | Ost | S 2SA -2 | ♦4 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Ost | N 3SA -1 | ♠A | −50 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 12 | Ost | W 2♥ +1 | ♦A | −140 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 4 | mit 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Ost | S 2♠ -1 | ♣D | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 2 | Ost | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | Ost | N 4♥ +1 | ♠K | +450 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 4 | Ost | N 2SA -1 | ♥9 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Ost | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | Ost | S 3SA +2 | ♥8 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 15 | Ost | N 3♠ -2 | ♥D | −200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 16 | Ost | N 2♥ +1 | ♠10 | +140 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Ergebnis: 14. Rang mit 77,0 MP = 48,13 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,12 |
Privatscore für Fr. Canz (13)
| Runde 1 | mit 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 31,25 % |
| Board 9 | Ost | O 4♠ +1 | ♥A | −650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | Ost | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Ost | N 3SA = | ♥4 | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | Ost | W 4♥ -1 | ♦K | +50 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 2 | mit 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | Ost | S 3♠ -2 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | Ost | S 2SA +1 | ♥4 | +150 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | Ost | N 5♥ -1 | ♠K | −50 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 4 | Ost | N 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 3 | mit 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 13 | Ost | W 3♠ = | ♦D | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | Ost | N 3SA +2 | ♠B | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 15 | Ost | S 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 16 | Ost | N 4♥ -2 | ♠10 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 4 | mit 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 34,38 % |
| Board 5 | Ost | W 3♦ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 6 | Ost | N 3♦ -1 | ♠2 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 7 | Ost | O 3SA +1 | ♦8 | −630 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 8 | Ost | N 3SA +2 | ♥2 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 17 | Ost | O 1SA +2 | ♠A | −150 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | Ost | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | Ost | O 4♣ X -3 | ♥10 | +800 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 20 | Ost | N 4♥ +1 | ♦2 | +650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Ergebnis: 20. Rang mit 65,0 MP = 40,63 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,73 |
Privatscore für Fr. Egbers (14)
| Runde 1 | mit 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 71,88 % |
| Board 13 | Ost | W 2♠ +1 | ♦D | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | Ost | N 2SA +2 | ♠B | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | Ost | W 2♦ +2 | ♥A | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 16 | Ost | W 2♠ +2 | ♥A | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 87,50 % |
| Board 5 | Ost | O 3SA +2 | ♥2 | −460 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 6 | Ost | W 2♠ = | ♣3 | −110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 7 | Ost | W 4♠ +2 | ♦A | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 8 | Ost | W 3♦ = | ♥A | −110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 37,50 % |
| Board 17 | Ost | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 18 | Ost | O 4♠ +1 | ♣7 | −450 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | Ost | O 3♣ -1 | ♥10 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 20 | Ost | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 4 | mit 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 9 | Ost | O 4♠ +2 | ♣K | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 10 | Ost | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | Ost | N 3SA = | ♣10 | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | Ost | N 4♦ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | Ost | S 3♠ = | ♣2 | +140 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | Ost | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 3 | Ost | O 5♠ -1 | ♥K | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 4 | Ost | S 2♠ -2 | ♣6 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 96,0 MP = 60,00 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,81 |
Privatscore für Fr. Hannig (15)
| Runde 1 | mit 20: Hr. K. Panne (53,13 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 17 | Ost | O 2SA +1 | ♠A | −150 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | Ost | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | Ost | S 4♠ -5 | ♣9 | −250 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 20 | Ost | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 2 | mit 19: Fr. Strotmann (61,00 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 78,13 % |
| Board 9 | Ost | O 6♠ X = | ♥A | −1660 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | Ost | S 3♥ -4 | ♣2 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 11 | Ost | W 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | Ost | W 4♥ -1 | ♦A | +50 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 3 | mit 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 1 | Ost | S 2♠ -2 | ♣B | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | Ost | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | Ost | O 4♠ X -1 | ♥K | +200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 4 | Ost | W 2♠ -4 | ♣K | +400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 4 | mit 17: Fr. Schmidt (29,75 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 34,38 % |
| Board 13 | Ost | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | Ost | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | Ost | N 2♠ = | ♣10 | +110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 16 | Ost | S 3SA +1 | ♠A | +430 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 16: Fr. E. Brockstedt (51,50 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 5 | Ost | O 2SA -2 | ♠9 | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 6 | Ost | N 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 7 | Ost | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | Ost | N 1SA +2 | ♥2 | +150 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Ergebnis: 3. Rang mit 95,0 MP = 59,38 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,66 |
Privatscore für Fr. E. Brockstedt (16)
| Runde 1 | mit 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | West | S 2♠ = | ♣D | +110 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 2 | West | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 3 | West | O 4♠ X = | ♠9 | −790 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 4 | West | W 3♦ -2 | ♠B | +200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 2 | mit 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 17 | West | O 1SA -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 18 | West | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | West | O 3♣ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 20 | West | S 3SA = | ♣D | +600 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 43,75 % |
| Board 13 | West | W 3♠ = | ♦D | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | West | N 3SA +2 | ♠B | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 15 | West | S 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 16 | West | N 4♥ -2 | ♠10 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 5 | West | O 2SA -2 | ♠9 | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 6 | West | N 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 7 | West | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | West | N 1SA +2 | ♥2 | +150 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Aufwertung | für 4 Boards: je 4,1 MP | 16,4 MP |
| Ergebnis: 11. Rang mit 82,4 MP = 51,50 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,14 |
Privatscore für Fr. Schmidt (17)
| Runde 1 | mit 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 21,88 % |
| Board 5 | West | O 3SA = | ♥2 | −400 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 6 | West | N 3♥ = | ♠K | +140 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 7 | West | W 2♥ +3 | ♣3 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 8 | West | N 3SA +2 | ♦2 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 3 | mit 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 37,50 % |
| Board 17 | West | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 18 | West | O 4♠ +1 | ♣7 | −450 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 19 | West | O 3♣ -1 | ♥10 | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 20 | West | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 4 | mit 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 34,38 % |
| Board 13 | West | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | West | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | West | N 2♠ = | ♣10 | +110 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 16 | West | S 3SA +1 | ♠A | +430 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
| Board 9 | West | O 4♠ +3 | ♥B | −710 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 10 | West | N 4♠ = | ♦7 | +620 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 11 | West | N 3SA = | ♠A | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | West | W 3♥ -2 | ♦A | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Aufwertung | für 4 Boards: je 2,4 MP | 9,6 MP |
| Ergebnis: 21. Rang mit 47,6 MP = 29,75 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −1,77 |
Privatscore für Hr. Holler (18)
| Runde 1 | mit 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 31,25 % |
| Board 9 | West | O 4♠ +1 | ♥A | −650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | West | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | West | N 3SA = | ♥4 | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | West | W 4♥ -1 | ♦K | +50 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 2 | mit 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 28,0 MP | = | 87,50 % |
| Board 5 | West | O 3SA +2 | ♥2 | −460 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 6 | West | W 2♠ = | ♣3 | −110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 7 | West | W 4♠ +2 | ♦A | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 8 | West | W 3♦ = | ♥A | −110 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 3 | mit 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 1 | West | S 2♠ -2 | ♣B | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | West | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | West | O 4♠ X -1 | ♥K | +200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 4 | West | W 2♠ -4 | ♣K | +400 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 4 | mit 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 17 | West | O 1SA = | ♠A | −90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 18 | West | O 2♠ +2 | ♣7 | −170 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 19 | West | N 3♦ +2 | ♥7 | +150 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 20 | West | S 2♥ +2 | ♣D | +170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 21: Fr. Lang (51,50 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | West | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | West | S 3SA +2 | ♥8 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 15 | West | N 3♠ -2 | ♥D | −200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 16 | West | N 2♥ +1 | ♠10 | +140 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Ergebnis: 10. Rang mit 83,0 MP = 51,88 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: −0,11 |
Privatscore für Fr. Strotmann (19)
| Runde 1 | mit 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 23,0 MP | = | 71,88 % |
| Board 13 | West | W 2♠ +1 | ♦D | −140 | = | 5,0 MP | + |
| Board 14 | West | N 2SA +2 | ♠B | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | West | W 2♦ +2 | ♥A | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 16 | West | W 2♠ +2 | ♥A | −170 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 2 | mit 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 25,0 MP | = | 78,13 % |
| Board 9 | West | O 6♠ X = | ♥A | −1660 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 10 | West | S 3♥ -4 | ♣2 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 11 | West | W 2♠ -1 | ♥A | +50 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 12 | West | W 4♥ -1 | ♦A | +50 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 4 | mit 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | West | S 2♠ -1 | ♣D | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 2 | West | S 3SA -1 | ♥4 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 3 | West | N 4♥ +1 | ♠K | +450 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 4 | West | N 2SA -1 | ♥9 | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 40,63 % |
| Board 17 | West | O 1SA +2 | ♠A | −150 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | West | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | West | O 4♣ X -3 | ♥10 | +800 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 20 | West | N 4♥ +1 | ♦2 | +650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Aufwertung | für 4 Boards: je 4,9 MP | 19,6 MP |
| Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 97,6 MP = 61,00 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,24 |
Privatscore für Hr. K. Panne (20)
| Runde 1 | mit 15: Fr. Hannig (59,38 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 10: Fr. Wendler (43,13 %) | 24,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
| Board 17 | West | O 2SA +1 | ♠A | −150 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 18 | West | O 4♠ +2 | ♥K | −480 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 19 | West | S 4♠ -5 | ♣9 | −250 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 20 | West | S 4♥ = | ♣8 | +620 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Runde 2 | mit 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %)
gegen 3: Fr. K. Panne (53,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | West | W 3♠ -1 | ♥A | +100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 14 | West | N 2SA +2 | ♣K | +180 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 15 | West | S 1SA -4 | ♥3 | −400 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 16 | West | N 2♥ +2 | ♠10 | +170 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Runde 3 | mit 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %)
gegen 1: Fr. Gunsser (46,25 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 19,0 MP | = | 59,38 % |
| Board 9 | West | W 4♠ +1 | ♥2 | −650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Board 10 | West | S 2SA -2 | ♦4 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | West | N 3SA -1 | ♠A | −50 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 12 | West | W 2♥ +1 | ♦A | −140 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Runde 4 | mit 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %)
gegen 4: Fr. Schatz (52,50 %) & 6: Fr. Tritschler (50,88 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 34,38 % |
| Board 5 | West | W 3♦ +1 | ♠2 | −130 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 6 | West | N 3♦ -1 | ♠2 | −50 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 7 | West | O 3SA +1 | ♦8 | −630 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 8 | West | N 3SA +2 | ♥2 | +460 | = | 1,0 MP | --- |
| Runde 5 | mit 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %)
gegen 2: Hr. U. Gminder (53,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 1 | West | S 3♠ = | ♣2 | +140 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 2 | West | N 1SA = | ♦6 | +90 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 3 | West | O 5♠ -1 | ♥K | +100 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 4 | West | S 2♠ -2 | ♣6 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Ergebnis: 8. Rang mit 85,0 MP = 53,13 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,25 |
Privatscore für Fr. Lang (21)
| Runde 2 | mit 13: Fr. Canz (40,63 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 9: Fr. Weimar (43,13 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 53,13 % |
| Board 1 | West | S 3♠ -2 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 2 | West | S 2SA +1 | ♥4 | +150 | = | 0,0 MP | --- |
| Board 3 | West | N 5♥ -1 | ♠K | −50 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ |
| Board 4 | West | N 1SA = | ♥9 | +90 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 3 | mit 11: Fr. E. Schmidt (41,88 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 8: Fr. Neifer (56,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 46,88 % |
| Board 5 | West | O 2SA = | ♠5 | −120 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 6 | West | W 2♠ -1 | ♣7 | +100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 7 | West | W 4♠ +3 | ♥10 | −710 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 8 | West | N 3SA +1 | ♥2 | +430 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Runde 4 | mit 14: Fr. Egbers (60,00 %)
gegen 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %) & 7: Fr. Baur (56,25 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 56,25 % |
| Board 9 | West | O 4♠ +2 | ♣K | −680 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 10 | West | N 4♠ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Board 11 | West | N 3SA = | ♣10 | +400 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 12 | West | N 4♦ -2 | ♥6 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ |
| Runde 5 | mit 5: Fr. Thomanek (43,75 %)
gegen 12: Fr. Ruck (48,13 %) & 18: Hr. Holler (51,88 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
| Board 13 | Süd | W 2♠ +1 | ♥A | −140 | = | 3,0 MP | - |
| Board 14 | Süd | S 3SA +2 | ♥8 | +460 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ |
| Board 15 | Süd | N 3♠ -2 | ♥D | −200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- |
| Board 16 | Süd | N 2♥ +1 | ♠10 | +140 | = | 4,0 MP | |
| Aufwertung | für 4 Boards: je 4,1 MP | 16,4 MP |
| Ergebnis: 11. Rang mit 82,4 MP = 51,50 % — Top: 8,0 MP — Rating: +0,26 |
Wir nutzen Cookies auf unserer Website. Einige von ihnen sind essenziell für den Betrieb der Seite, während andere uns helfen, diese Website und die Nutzererfahrung zu verbessern (Tracking Cookies). Sie können selbst entscheiden, ob Sie die Cookies zulassen möchten. Bitte beachten Sie, dass bei einer Ablehnung womöglich nicht mehr alle Funktionalitäten der Seite zur Verfügung stehen.
Drucken
